I searched for a solution to this problem, and found urxvt-perls by Bert Muennich. His clipboard plugin for urxvt adds CTRL-v pasting to urxvt. It solved the problem perfectly.

Another great tool along these lines, is parcellite. It unifies your primary clipboard (those things you highlight with the mouse) with the copy clipboard (things you specifically use CTRL-c or Edit > Copy for). With parcellite running, you can click the “Copy URL to Clipboard” icon on Github, then ALT+Tab to your terminal, and type: git clone <CTRL-v> to clone.

def revision_from_git
  if File.exists?(scope('.git/HEAD'))
   Dir.chdir scope(".") do
     `git rev-parse HEAD`
    end
  end
end

Since my git lives in a non-standard location, it was failing:

/Users/xxxxxxxx/.rvm/gems/ruby-1.9.2-p290@global/bundler/gems/compass-91a748a91636/lib/compass/version.rb:48:in ``': No such file or directory - git rev-parse HEAD (Errno::ENOENT)

Searching for a solution, I found a page in the EmacsWiki that dealt with this issue, but I didn’t care for any of the solutions there. What I went with was to open ~/.MacOSX/environment.plist with the Property List Editor, and add the path to my git executable to the PATH variable therein. I then had to reboot. The reboot seems to be the only way to get launchd to re-read this file. I launch Emacs via Spotlight, and so it is started by launchd behind the scenes. I tried using launchctl setenv first, as mentioned in the EmacsWiki, but that didn’t seem to work, I’m not sure why.

With the PATH variable set, rspec-mode, and rvm.el loaded, I was able to successfully run my specs from within Emacs.

When /^(?:|I )unselect "([^"]*)" from "([^"]*)"$/ do |value, field|
  unselect(value, :from => field)
end

Just before the weirdness

This blank line is the weirdness, it’s really disconcerting when typing a long command, or when using readline to look through previous commands.

The weirdness continues…

But a CTRL-l will help ease our pain.

The weirdness seems to have something to do with being at the bottom of a terminal window. The problem is not exhibited at the top of an empty window.

A solution is to set your TERM value in Terminal.app to xterm.

Securely Passing Your UserVoice API Key To Heroku

In order to pass your UserVoice API key to Heroku without committing it in plain-text in your git repository we make use of Heroku’s config feature.

$ heroku config:add USERVOICE_API_KEY=<your api key> USERVOICE_USER=<your username>

This will make your UserVoice API Key and username accessible to your Heroku Rails app via ENV["USERVOICE_API_KEY"] and ENV["USERVOICE_USER"] respectively.

Now we simply need to get these values into the uservoice gem’s config/uservoice.yml configuration file. To do this, we need to add ERB support to the uservoice gem’s config loadermy pull request has been accepted, and this functionality is baked in to the uservoice gem as of version 0.3.1.

Now we can setup our uservoice gem configuration file like so:

uservoice_options:
  # required
  key: <%= ENV["USERVOICE_USER"] %>
  host: my_app.uservoice.com
  forum: my_app
  # optional
  showTab: true
  alignment: left
  background_color: "#f00"
  text_color: white
  hover_color: "#06C"
  lang: en

uservoice_api:
  api_key: <%= ENV["USERVOICE_API_KEY"] %>

Installing The Uservoice Gem To Heroku

Of course we need to add the uservoice gem to our .gems file. However, the uservoice gem lists Rails as a dependency. This means that when Heroku installs the uservoice gem, it will also install the latest version of Rails (2.3.8 at the time of writing). Heroku’s stack currently relies on Rails version 2.3.5, and having the two versions of Rails installed causes a clash. The solution is to add the --ignore-dependencies flag to the uservoice line of the .gems file. However, this means that Heroku won’t install uservoice’s other dependency, the ezcrypto gem. To work around that, we simply add ezcrypto manually, on it’s own line, to the .gems file. The lines that need to be added should look like this:

# <RAILS_ROOT>/.gems
ezcrypto --version '>= 0.7.2'
uservoice --version '>= 0.3.1'  --ignore-dependencies

While the version arguments aren’t strictly necessary, I’ve found it helpful to be explicit when specifying gems, to help alleviate issues caused by new versions of gems being released in the middle of my development cycle.

With those changes in place, you should be able to push your git repository to Heroku and receive all sorts of great user feedback.

(add-hook 'ruby-mode-hook
	  (lambda ()
	    (define-key ruby-mode-map "\C-c#" 'comment-or-uncomment-region)
	    )
	  )

This assigns C-c # to comment the current region, or if the current region is already commented, it will uncomment the region.

But what about when there’s no region currently marked? It would be nice if emacs would (un)comment the current line. To do this, I took a page from DJCB at Emacs-fu.

(defadvice comment-or-uncomment-region (before slick-comment activate compile)
  "When called interactively with no active region, comment a single line instead."
  (interactive
   (if mark-active (list (region-beginning) (region-end))
     (list (line-beginning-position)
	   (line-beginning-position 2)))))

Now with nothing marked, pressing C-c # will cause emacs to toggle commenting on the current line.

In case it isn’t obvious, one should add the abbove snippets to their .emacs file to gain their benefits.

By default, autotest implements filesystem polling to detect these changes. This can use a significant amount of CPU cycles¹, and can impact battery life in laptops.

Through Linux’s inotify, autotest-inotify inserts callbacks into the underlying filesystem, which allows the filesystem to notify us when files we’re interested in have been modified. This allows autotest to sleep until inotify indicates a change has been made to one our files of interest, i.e. we don’t have to constantly poll the filesystem.

This work was inspired by Sven Schwyn’s work on autotest-fsevent, which extends autotest to use Mac OS X’s FSEvents system, as well as Alban Peignier’s work using the INotify gem. Where autotest-inotify differs from Schwyn’s work, is that autotest-inotify can be used in Linux, whereas autotest-fsevent uses FSEvent, which is Mac OS X specific. Autotest-inotify differs from Peignier’s work in that it offers a simpler gem-based installation, and it is less obtrusive to autotest’s methods for determining which files to watch for changes.

Source code for the autotest-inotify gem can be found at http://github.com/ewollesen/autotest-inotify. It is licensed under the MIT license. See the README for installation instructions.

1. On one of my machines, ~25% of a single core’s cycles were spent polling the filesystem

config.saikuro = {
  :output_directory => "#{ENV["CC_BUILD_ARTIFACTS"]}/scratch/saikuro", 
  :input_directory => ["app\" --input_directory \"lib"],
  :cyclo => "",
  :filter_cyclo => "0",
  :warn_cyclo => "5",
  :error_cyclo => "7",
  :formater => "text", #this needs to be set to "text"
}
config.flay = {
  :dirs_to_flay => ['app', 'lib',],
  :minimum_score => 10, 
}

My changes in bold.

If you have multiple ways to construct a valid object, it can be hard to show this through constructors, since constructors can only vary on the number and type of parameters. This is when Abstract Factory Methods come into play, these can use a combination of private constructors and setters to implement their work. The problem with classic Factory Methods for components assembly is that they are usually seen as static methods, and you can’t have those on interfaces. You can make a factory class, but then that just becomes another service instance. A factory service is often a good tactic, but you still have to instantiate the factory using one of the techniques here.

Fowler’s objections with respect to static methods on interfaces are specific to java, and don’t apply in python or ruby, since neither have native interfaces. Yet I see DI used in both ruby and python, so I still feel like there has to be another difference.

Next I found some interesting thoughts at Stack Overflow, but none of the responses shed a clear light on the subject for me.

What finally got the light in my head to switch on, oddly enough, was an article by Jakob Jenkov. After reading Jenkov, I understood that both AF and DI are responsible for creating instances of objects. Furthermore, they both decouple the class requesting object creation from having to know any details about the created object that they’ll receive. Where they’re different, is that when AF is being used, the class desiring the creation of an object needs to know about—and send a message to—an AF, whereas with DI, the class desiring the creation of an object is simply handed that object during it’s own initialization. To put it another way, the object on which it relies is “injected” into it at its own creation. This is the inversion, that rather than the class needing to ask for an object to be created, it is instead handed the object.

Now that the light was on, I re-read the first few references, and I found that may of them made more sense. Funny how that works.